The US and China have issued a joint statement announcing that they have agreed reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, in anticipation of United Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations for an international climate change agreement in Paris next year
--------------
Sometimes, it can feel as though there’s not much good news about on the climate front.
But then again, the picture can lighten a bit.
So it was, when, on November 12, the US and China issued a joint statement announcing that they’re committed to an ‘ambitious’ international climate change agreement, as part of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations which will take place in Paris next year.
The background to this stems from a meeting in 2011 involving the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol parties in Durban, South Africa.
One of the key outcomes of this conference was agreement to adopt a global climate change agreement, by 2015, to replace the Kyoto Protocol.
The new global climate change agreement would, they said, start in 2020.
In anticipation of the Paris negotiations, the European Council agreed, in October, a binding target for the EU to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2030, as part of the EU Climate and Energy 2030 Framework – this, of course, affects the UK – unless the UK Government abandons its commitments to act as a good global citizen, something that’s been threatened from time to time.
So much for the ‘Greenest Government Ever’, Mr Cameron.
In the meantime, some countries have used the failure of bigger players such as the US and China to play a full part as an excuse to delay taking steps themselves.
Unbelievably, and shamingly, we in the Green Centre have actually heard from an MHK’s lips the phrase ‘there’s no point in the Isle of Man cutting its carbon emissions whilst China’s still belching them out’ – as if being able only to do little excused doing nothing.
It’s a bit like saying: ‘We’re only killing one or two people through our selfish inaction – so that makes it OK.’
However, that excuse appears to be falling away now.
Why so? Well, last week, on November12 – the US and China issued a joint statement of commitment to an ‘ambitious’ international climate change agreement in 2015.
Their statement sets out specific targets, which they hope will encourage other countries to announce their own ‘ambitious actions’.
So far, so good.
The US says that it will achieve an economy-wide target of reduced emissions by 26 per cent to 28 per cent below 2005 levels in 2025, making best efforts to achieve the top end of that target range.
And China, for its part, will:
– Achieve peak CO2 emissions around 2030, making best efforts to achieve peak emissions before 2030.
– Increase the share of non-fossil fuels in its primary energy consumption to around 20 per cent by 2030.
The two countries have also agreed to work more closely together on other climate change measures, including:
– Investing in joint clean energy research and development.
– Advancing carbon capture and storage and enhanced water recovery.
– Reducing hydrofluorocarbons.
– Reducing carbon emissions from cities.
– Promoting trade in green goods.
– Demonstrating clean energy on the ground, including energy efficiency in buildings and boilers, solar power and smart grids.
The UK government welcomed the announcement as a ‘clear sign that major economies are serious about getting a global deal in Paris’, which is a bit rich when they also keep rumbling about abandoning green aspirations themselves, but there you go.
Other companies and organisations have also welcomed the announcement, particularly as the US and China together account for 42 per cent of global emissions, and together with the 40 per cent reduction target from the EU, this accounts for more than 50 per cent of global emissions.
So what does this mean for us?
Well, the island’s government has made lots of noise about climate change commitments, but so far action has been derisory; what’s needed is practical action, and soon (and I mean this in the context of Manx energy generation and consumption, not just that which we might facilitate by leasing our seabeds for offshore wind and marine renewable developments – to help the UK Government achieve its own targets).
A good, if small, start would be the establishment of some real incentives for household, business and community renewable microgeneration, so as to give our residents choice and the prospect of price stability.
This would also help create new jobs, skills and opportunities – which are likely to be much-needed in our changing economic environment.
Let’s get on with it!